史上最便宜服务器:仅需8.88美元一年的CN2 VPS

现在pacificrack农历春节活动,400M内存的cn2 vps仅需要8.88美元年付,简直是史低!买回来可以当传家宝的!你说它不香吗?

买回来不仅仅可以搭建自己的个人网站,还可以搭建个人代理服务,去国外看看噢~看些嘿嘿嘿的东西嘻嘻嘻~想要知道怎么搭建的朋友可以用头条搜索:科学上网,即可获知怎么搭建啦。

想知道怎么购买吗?访问我的博客:https://www.littlemodesty.com/website-building/vps/pacificrack-vps-test/ 一探究竟噢~

史上最便宜服务器:仅需8.88美元一年的CN2 VPS

评测:

一、购入

pacificrack 是一家最近才火起来的服务商,据说是国人运营的 quadranet 的子公司(pacificrack 好像就是 quadranet 的曾用名)。机房在 quadranet 自家的机房里,目前走的是 CN2 GT 线路,如果不翻车的话性价比那是非常高了。但是这家的口碑比较两极分化,有的人用起来觉得很不错,有的人却连环翻车,初步估计是分到的母鸡不同的锅,真一切全看脸。

购买支持使用支付宝付款,博主购买的是7.25美元一年384MB内存的元旦优惠 VPS ,分分钟付款开机。

二、与 Vultr 的对比测试

由于 Pacificrack 在面板里最高只有 Debian 9 64位版本可选,所有测试都运行在 Debian 9 环境下。同时,为了控制变量,测试用 Vultr VPS 的位置为美西洛杉矶机房,配置为1H1G。

1、服务器性能

IO测试

第一次:I/O speed(1st run)   : 89.4 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run)   : 104 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run)   : 92.0 MB/sAverage I/O speed    : 95.1 MB/s第二次:I/O speed(1st run)   : 90.1 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run)   : 88.0 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run)   : 95.4 MB/sAverage I/O speed    : 91.2 MB/s第三次:I/O speed(1st run)   : 111 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run)   : 112 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run)   : 131 MB/sAverage I/O speed    : 118.0 MB/s
Vultr
I/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 356 MB/sI/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 353 MB/sI/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 346 MB/sAverage I/O Speed    : 351.7 MB/sI/O speed(1st run)   : 341 MB/sI/O speed(2nd run)   : 351 MB/sI/O speed(3rd run)   : 350 MB/sAverage I/O speed    : 347.3 MB/s

和 Vultr 相比这样的IO成绩肯定不算快(毕竟人家用的可是 SSD ,但用来建站也差不多够了。

UnixBench跑分测试

 BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)   System: Csyvps: GNU/Linux   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-4-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u1 (2017-12-23)   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")   CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (5200.0 bogomips)          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET   01:47:14 up  1:07,  1 user,  load average: 0.09, 0.24, 0.30; runlevel 5------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 17 2020 01:47:14 - 02:15:241 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables       19399515.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone                     3052.9 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput                               2585.2 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        567586.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          138207.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1135564.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput                             1376439.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching                 134205.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation                               6433.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4866.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    660.9 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead                        2258575.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   19399515.4   1662.3Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3052.9    555.1Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2585.2    601.2File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     567586.8   1433.3File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     138207.8    835.1File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1135564.2   1957.9Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1376439.2   1106.5Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     134205.9    335.5Process Creation                                126.0       6433.5    510.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4866.1   1147.7Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        660.9   1101.6System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2258575.5   1505.7                                                                   ========System Benchmarks Index Score                                         938.9
Vultr
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)   System: vultr.guest: GNU/Linux   OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.9.0-11-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3+deb9u2 (2019-11-11)   Machine: x86_64 (unknown)   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")   CPU 0: Virtual CPU 523cbcdd6ca4 (4788.9 bogomips)          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET   09:36:01 up 23 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.39, 0.18, 0.11; runlevel 5------------------------------------------------------------------------Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 18 2020 09:36:01 - 10:04:061 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables       25349335.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone                     4294.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput                               3378.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        382653.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          107060.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1039637.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput                              561534.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching                  89520.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation                               7050.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   5807.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    788.3 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead                         329676.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   25349335.0   2172.2Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4294.3    780.8Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3378.6    785.7File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     382653.0    966.3File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     107060.5    646.9File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1039637.6   1792.5Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     561534.3    451.4Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      89520.1    223.8Process Creation                                126.0       7050.7    559.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       5807.6   1369.7Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        788.3   1313.8System Call Overhead                          15000.0     329676.0    219.8                                                                   ========System Benchmarks Index Score                                         753.3

令人出乎意料的是,pacificrack 的性能竟然好于 Vultr。这对于一些比较吃 CPU 的应用可能会有些帮助。

2、网络性能测试

Pacificrack

国内: Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency      Speedtest.net    405.11 Mbit/s     565.16 Mbit/s       2.951 ms    Fast.com         0.00 Mbit/s       130.7 Mbit/s        -            Beijing 5G   CT  2.02 Mbit/s       4.43 Mbit/s         -           Nanjing 5G   CT  3.07 Mbit/s       6.61 Mbit/s         -           Hefei 5G     CT  2.29 Mbit/s       6.84 Mbit/s         -           Guangzhou 5G CT  6.54 Mbit/s       11.11 Mbit/s        -           TianJin 5G   CU  29.17 Mbit/s      8.29 Mbit/s         -           Shanghai 5G  CU  18.94 Mbit/s      21.42 Mbit/s        -           Guangzhou 5G CU  58.49 Mbit/s      8.61 Mbit/s         -           Tianjin 5G   CM  3.56 Mbit/s       107.28 Mbit/s       -           Wuxi 5G      CM  2.84 Mbit/s       6.72 Mbit/s         -           Nanjing 5G   CM  0.85 Mbit/s       12.11 Mbit/s        -           Hefei 5G     CM  14.96 Mbit/s      124.84 Mbit/s       -           Changsha 5G  CM  3.59 Mbit/s       24.15 Mbit/s        -      国外:Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download SpeedCacheFly                        205.234.175.175         31.4MB/s      Linode, Tokyo2, JP              139.162.65.37           9.71MB/s      Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            5.74MB/s      Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           8.00MB/s      Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           1.36MB/s      Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             17.3MB/s      Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           1.05MB/s      Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          981KB/s       Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            386KB/s       Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           337KB/s       Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          290KB/s       

Vultr

国内:  Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency      Speedtest.net    2372.69 Mbit/s    1957.47 Mbit/s      1.263 ms    Fast.com         0.00 Mbit/s       151.3 Mbit/s        -            Beijing 5G   CT  8.36 Mbit/s       3.99 Mbit/s         -           Nanjing 5G   CT  67.04 Mbit/s      342.91 Mbit/s       -           Hefei 5G     CT  10.98 Mbit/s      133.37 Mbit/s       -           Guangzhou 5G CT  1.81 Mbit/s       28.90 Mbit/s        -           TianJin 5G   CU  22.65 Mbit/s      39.31 Mbit/s        -           Shanghai 5G  CU  111.81 Mbit/s     7.82 Mbit/s         -           Guangzhou 5G CU  97.45 Mbit/s      192.28 Mbit/s       -           Tianjin 5G   CM  0.39 Mbit/s       1.99 Mbit/s         -           Wuxi 5G      CM  4.21 Mbit/s       5.73 Mbit/s         -           Nanjing 5G   CM  1.39 Mbit/s       37.00 Mbit/s        -           Hefei 5G     CM  67.43 Mbit/s      153.11 Mbit/s       -           Changsha 5G  CM  16.73 Mbit/s      177.33 Mbit/s       -     国外:Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download SpeedCacheFly                        205.234.175.175         66.1MB/s      Linode, Tokyo2, JP              139.162.65.37           17.9MB/s      Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            13.1MB/s      Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           13.9MB/s      Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           13.2MB/s      Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             75.8MB/s      Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           33.8MB/s      Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          39.6MB/s      Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            4.88MB/s      Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           7.42MB/s      Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          8.41MB/s          

显然,pacificrack 的网速实在是过于缓慢,无论是在国内还是国外,都被 Vultr 甩了几条街。尤其是对于移动和电信的用户,更是惨不忍睹。(当时买的时候说是 CN2 VPS,现在看来是一条假 CN2 了。)

还想得知更详细信息的朋友可以访问: pacificrack Vultr,里面有了各种各样的测试结果,包括网速、路由、Ping 等。

三、总结

总的来说,pacificrack 的 VPS 虽然卖的便宜,但各项性能都不太好,特别是具有网络连接缓慢这个致命伤。打算用它来建站的朋友可得小心了,不过联通用户拿来停飞机倒是一个不错的选择。

各位想要建站的朋友可以考虑 Vultr 。新用户用我的 aff 可以获得$100的体验金噢。链接:https://www.vultr.com/?ref=8379290-6G

本文来自网络各大VPS服务器厂商及VPS测评推荐博客,不代表虚拟服务器 立场,转载请注明出处:https://www.xnfwq.com/vps/1304.html

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

此站点使用Akismet来减少垃圾评论。了解我们如何处理您的评论数据

返回顶部